On Mon, 13 Mar, Richard Hipp wrote:
>
> The upgrade is simple.  Just replace your current fossil executable
> with a new one.  Everything should work exactly as it did before.
> There are no incompatibilities.  The only difference is that Fossil
> 2.1 will read and write the latest repositories whereas Fossil 1.x
> will not.

Thanks for the encouragement, it turned out that it exactly worked like
this. We did not yet find any breakage in command line usage or output.
Nice job. :-)

However one concern was raised: What, if for some reason, some fossil
user has to go back to version 1.x from 2.x. I just did a short test
with a "fossil-1 rebuild" on a fossil-2 repository. The only thing that
in my quick test survived was the initial empty checkin, but not the
following content checkins. Another "fossil-2 rebuild" however brought
back the contents.

So, do I assume that once you start working with fossil-2 on the
repository, you cannot "rebuild back" to version 1, even if you do not
(intent to) use new fossil 2 features? So, to be on the safe side one
would have to take a backup of the fossil in version 1 state? Or is
there any "go back to version 1 format" emergency way?

Greetings,
Stefan

-- 
Stefan Bellon
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Reply via email to