On 2017-09-14 23:43, Richard Hipp wrote:
On 9/14/17, Thomas <tho...@dateiliste.com> wrote:
The biggest disadvantage - as my coworkers pointed out - is that the
downloadable executables do not come with https enabled.
At one time that was true. But I think all of the precompiled
binaries on the site now have https enabled by default, don't that?
Have you tried the recent once? I pretty sure the Windows binaries in
particular support https out of the box.
Uhm, no, I hadn't. I just downloaded the latest Windows executable and
it came with https enabled.
Thanks! That's a great leap forward! In my opinion, there's now in my
opinion nothing left that'd make Git superiour to Fossil unless you got
a huge amount of contributors (according to the Fossil documentation),
or a project spanning several gigabytes. I'll certainly pass this on.
But I won't let you off like that nonetheless. :)
Why hasn't this been announced properly, or have I overslept it? ;-)
Cheers
Thoas
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
