On 20/11/17 17:01, Warren Young wrote: > On Nov 20, 2017, at 2:55 PM, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas > <off...@riseup.net> wrote: >> On 20/11/17 16:45, Carlo Miron wrote: >>> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 9:33 PM, Warren Young <war...@etr-usa.com> wrote: >>> >>>> When the FILENAME parameter is not given, it produces a “Fossil” >>>> subdirectory containing the contents of tip-of-trunk, with the directory >>>> name coming from the project configuration under Admin. The SQLite repo >>>> file is stored inside the subdirectory in a hidden file; I propose >>>> .fslrepo. >>> Or maybe `.fossil`, as in Kyle's golang contribution? >>> https://go.googlesource.com/go/+/master/src/cmd/go/internal/get/vcs.go#330 >> I would go also with ".fossil" as default extension (is the one I use >> right now). > .fossil as an extension for clones is one thing: it is not simply a > convention due to “fossil server /DIRECTORY” scanning behavior. > > There is no reason the hidden file need follow this convention. In fact, it > would be harmful: > > $ fossil server /path/to/clone-and-open/checkout/directory > > This would find .fossil and require that you pass an empty name in the clone > URL. Confusing and maybe not even possible, since http://localhost:8080 and > http://localhost:8080/ are normally treated as equivalent. > > Furthermore, we already have .fsl* at the root of a checkout. Shouldn’t we > follow the existing convention?
OK. I didn't understand this totally. I thought that was the extension the shallow cloned repository would get if no extension name was specified. Cheers, Offray _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
