Thus said Jacob MacDonald on Fri, 24 Nov 2017 18:52:41 +0000: > Seems like I'm in the minority, but I prefer the A version. I tend to > like compact UIs and having all the relevant information close > together and the commit hash prominently displayed is nice.
The only reason why I said that the separate line was cleaner was because it made it easier to find the commit hash. When it is all on one line, I actually prefer the commit hash to be the very first piece of text on the line. This makes everything justified nicely and it's easy to predict where I should place my mouse if I want to copy/paste or click on the hash. If it's in some random place on the line because the ``details'' have been moved to the end of a variable length comment, then I would rather have the ``details'' on a line by itself which preserves the ability to navigate commit hashes easily in the timeline. Andy -- TAI64 timestamp: 400000005a1a458d _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
