I would like yesterdays with a bit of whitespace between commit comments. Also someone liked the original because the checkin tag was in a predictable place. If you put the tag last in the extra information it would be predictably at the right margin.
On 27 November 2017 at 21:01, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote: > On 11/27/17, Steve Landers <st...@digitalsmarties.com> wrote: > > Nice work. > > > > Have you considered dropping the borders on the commits? They do add > > definition to the commit, but at the expense of repetition and possibly > > “noise” when the branch isn’t colored > > Here are comparison links: > > As it was yesterday: > https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/timeline > https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/timeline?dp=d95f712&n=4 > https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/timeline?b=2017-09-01 > https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/finfo?name=src/db.c > > Warren Young's new approach: > https://www2.fossil-scm.org/fossil/timeline > https://www2.fossil-scm.org/fossil/timeline?dp=d95f712&n=4 > https://www2.fossil-scm.org/fossil/timeline?b=2017-09-01 > https://www2.fossil-scm.org/fossil/finfo?name=src/db.c > > Steve Landers' modifications to Warren's approach: > https://www3.fossil-scm.org/site.cgi/timeline > https://www3.fossil-scm.org/site.cgi/timeline?dp=d95f712&n=4 > https://www3.fossil-scm.org/site.cgi/timeline?b=2017-09-01 > https://www3.fossil-scm.org/site.cgi/finfo?name=src/db.c > > Please do not restrict yourself to just the links shown. Look at > various timelines to see what works well and what does not. > > -- > D. Richard Hipp > d...@sqlite.org > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users >
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
