On Tue 28 Nov 2017 10:36 PM, Andy Bradford wrote: > Thus said Richard Hipp on Mon, 27 Nov 2017 17:41:55 -0500: > > > I have installed the new look (temporarily at least) on > > https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil so that we can live with it for a > > while to see how we like it. > > I tend to prefer having more information to less, but the biggest > drawback to hiding everything is that now every commit message seems to > blend together with all the adjacent commits in the same branch. Before, > we at least had all the commit hashes at the beginning of each commit > message which served as a natural divider between commits; also there > were some links that were underlined (tags, branches, and users) > providing some level of distinction between them, but now that this > information is hidden, all the comments from a single branch blend > together making it difficult to make sense of it all. >
yes, in this view without the spacing or commit IDs, I agree. Would it look better if the diff buttons were moved over towards the commits, or would that get too ugly with multiple branches? When seen in this view, the commits are a easier to follow: https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/timeline?ymd=2017-11-28 The commit IDs are hidden away so we don't have to skip over them with our eyes, but we're able to expose it if we want by clicking on the commit. > Just my $0.02. > > Andy > -- > TAI64 timestamp: 400000005a1e4794 _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
