On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote:
> On 12/5/17, Reimer Behrends <behre...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Richard Hipp wrote: > >> Which is better? > >> > >> A: https://www.fossil-scm.org/a/timeline > >> B: https://www.fossil-scm.org/b/timeline > > > > I don't see much of a difference, > > Thanks for looking. But the original question is old, and the display is > moved on. [...] Please keep a close eye on the Fossil website and report any usability > issues. > None of the 4 current views have the author/branch/hash links below the message in smaller and slightly washed out color as seen at one point on the A/B testing I believe. They are all at the far end-right, and when using full screen windows on a large monitor, this forces the gaze to move horizontally too much from left to right IMHO. If there was 1 "modern" view (i.e. with boxes) but with a 2-lines setup, with the first line for commit message in the "normal" font, and a second for the meta-data and links in a smaller font with a bit less visibility (to allow reading the commit messages top to bottom without interfering visually too much), it would fit wide screen much better IMHO. We could call it "modern wide-screen" for example. My $0.02. --DD
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
