Thus said Richard Hipp on Thu, 29 Mar 2018 06:51:45 -0400: > You can't. But in more than a decade of use, this has never come up > before? Is this really a serious problem? Do we need to add new checks > to verify that the _FOSSIL_ file refers to the correct repository?
I would say it's a ``nice to have'' as I cannot imagine it happening very often. For this to present an actual problem the repositories would have to have identical filenames and rids would have to at least be somewhat consisent. Fossil did return an error about there being a mismatch: > $ fossil commit -m "test 2" > Could not find a valid check-in for RID 6. Possible checkout/repo mismatch. What are the chances that RID 6 would have actually matched a checkin and that those files would also have been found in the repository? Had the right conditions existed, I supposed the commit would have succeeded? Andy -- TAI64 timestamp: 400000005abe4741 _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
