On 6/15/18, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote: > On 6/15/18, Chad Perrin <c...@apotheon.net> wrote: >> >> This would not technically be a "pull request". It would be a "merge >> request". > > Good point. It should not be called "pull-request" as pulling does > not come into play. > > On the other hand, it is not necessary a request to merge. Often a > merge is implied, but the reviewer instead might prefer to accept the > changes but leave them on a branch. In that case it might be called > "push-request". Once the branch gets pushed, then merging can come > later.
Other ideas for what to name this (hypothetical and unimplemented) command: fossil contribute fossil bequest fossil bestow fossil proffer -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
