On Thu 21 Jun 2018 7:47 PM, E Cruz wrote: > On 06/21/2018 05:06 PM, Warren Young wrote: > > As mentioned in the original post, the majority of the time taken by the > clone operation seems to be spent re-calculating the delta encoding of the > large table definition files. I do not mind much the time it takes to > commit changes to the large tables, although if that can be improved it > would be welcomed. But once that is done, we have to pay for the delta > encoding on every future clone operation. That is the part I would like to > avoid if possible. >
Just curious, how often are you cloning and opening the repo? With git, I've had it take a little while to expand the repo. For a comparison, clone the sqlite repo and see if it's quicker/slower/about the same as your repo clone. I believe the sqlite repo is larger than yours. _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
