On Jul 12, 2018, at 4:06 PM, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote: > > On 7/12/18, Jungle Boogie <jungleboog...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> openBSD -current x64 > > I don't have access to such a system for debugging purposes. Can you > suggest a patch?
I’d suggest revisiting the decision to replace cc-check-function-in-lib with the custom check-function-in-lib variant. The logic behind it seems suspect: you *want* it to modify LIBS because you order the calls to the function in leaf-to-root order. That is, the checks should be ordered so: cc-check-function-in-lib dlopen dl cc-check-function-in-lib iconv iconv cc-check-function-in-lib inflateEnd z cc-check-function-in-lib gethostbyname nsl cc-check-function-in-lib ns_name_uncompress resolv cc-check-function-in-lib sqlite3_open sqlite3 $extralibs cc-check-function-in-lib dlopen dl That call list is based on the current contents of auto.def, but consider it pseudocode, not a patch, intended just to show the pattern: the most depended-upon library is checked for first, because it may be needed to link one or more of those that follow, especially on non-Linux systems which usually have linkers that won’t chase dependencies for you automatically. The stock version of cc-check-function-in-lib *prepends* each subsequent library for this very reason: so that the first-checked library ends up at the *end* of LIBS. _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
