Any of you two care to comment on how this affects my plans to edit the INSTALL file? Should I wait and then retry Bruno's procedure?
-- Chan On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 8:01 AM, Bruno Cornec <[email protected]> wrote: > Matt Taggart said on Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 04:40:27PM -0800: > >> Actually it doesn't, but it was doing some checking in a way that was >> noisy. I switched to a less verbose way. > > Thanks ! > >> > Also I added the fo-cleanold script to the package, in order to support >> > clean uninstall. >> >> Well how will you call it if it's in the package? > > It will be called in the %preun phase (before removing the files during > the un-install pahse) > >> For the debian packages I just replicated the needed parts in the postrm >> script. > > Why ? Can't you just call the script ? It's much more interesting to not > duplicate. I'm sure Debian has a similar featur no ? > >> Although I suppose maybe you could use fo-cleanold pre-removal in the purge >> case.... > > yep ;-) > >> I've been thinking about building/installing some of the stuff in utils/ as >> part of the normal install, sounds like that might help you. > > Let me know if you change it so that I can adapt the package > accordingly. > >> > FATAL: shm_open: Function not implemented >> > FATAL: shm_open failed with errno >> I think nealk found an answer for this one, something about /dev/shm >> permissions IIRC. Do you have that setup? > > Humm sorry I don't understand xhat you mean. What should I provide to you ? > Bruno. > -- > Linux Profession Lead EMEA / Open Source Ambassador \ EMEA CME SoL. Center > http://www.mondorescue.org / HP/Intel Solution Center \ http://hpintelco.net > Des infos sur Linux? http://www.HyPer-Linux.org http://www.hp.com/linux > La musique ancienne? http://www.musique-ancienne.org http://www.medieval.org > _______________________________________________ fossology mailing list [email protected] http://fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology
