Thank you for your response. I tried to follow the instructions below that were documented to add a license template:
Place your file under /usr/local/share/fossology/agents/licenses/. Run 'sudo fossinit'. The ”…” sequence indicates that the licenses are being installed. I created a directory under /usr/local/share/fossology/agents/licenses/ called <Company Name>. I noticed the files under the other directories containing the licenses were not just text files, but a different format. I copied two files from a different directory, it included the file that included the license and the .meta file to the directory I created. I then renamed the files to <Company Name> and <Company Name>.meta. I updated the file <Company Name> to contain our license. I then executed the following command: /usr/local/bin/fossinit /usr/local/share/fossology/agents/licenses/ The command completed successfully, but when I went to the "Manage License Terms" Page, it showed the Canonical name twice, once as <Company Name> and once as <Company Name>~. I then uploaded a file that contained the license and the result was it found a license of type license, not <Company Name>. It seems that I'm not creating the license template correctly. Could someone please provide details on how to properly create a license template under /usr/local/share/fossology/agents/licenses that has the same file type as the others. Thank You --- On Tue, 6/2/09, Laser, Mary <[email protected]> wrote: From: Laser, Mary <[email protected]> Subject: [FOSSology] FW: Identifying new license in Fossology To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Date: Tuesday, June 2, 2009, 4:08 PM Oops! forgot to cc the list. From: Laser, Mary Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 1:08 PM To: '[email protected]' Subject: RE: [FOSSology] Identifying new license in Fossology If you are trying to add an entire license vs. a phrase, you should follow the directions for adding a license template. License Terms are used to "fine tune" the results of an identified license. For instance, if a GPL v2 license is identified as GPL with unknown version, the section of identified license text will be compared against License Terms to pinpoint the exact license (GPL v2). >From what you've described, the license cannot be identified (because there is >no template). Therefore, there is no license text to compare against the >License Terms. HTH, Mary From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 11:52 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [FOSSology] Identifying new license in Fossology Hello, I am trying to identify a new license in Fossology. I am using the "Manage License Terms" page through the UI to do this but am having some difficulty. I created a new Canonical name called "Company Name" and created a new term that was specific to that group. The term was the following: "Copyright Company Name". I then did an Upload from a URL which contained a license file that contained that term. However, the result was it did not find the license. What's strange is when I add the term "proprietary" to the group, it recognizes it, but any other phrase, it does not recognize. Should I be using the UI to identify a new license or should I follow the instructions on the page "How to Add a License Template or License Phrase and Re-Analyze Licenses" in the documenation to do this? The documentation says it requires re-running the build and modifying the database.. Any help is greatly appreciated. Thanks -----Inline Attachment Follows----- _______________________________________________ fossology mailing list [email protected] http://fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology
_______________________________________________ fossology mailing list [email protected] http://fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology
