> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Gobeille, Robert > Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 12:24 PM > To: Donohoe, Mark > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [FOSSology] Scheduler Status page > > So you are proposing that we add notes about all outstanding > bugs targeted for 1.1 to the release notes? > Sounds reasonable to me. There aren't very many. I think it > would be good to get these down to a one liner + url to the bug. > > Bob > > > On Jul 14, 2009, at 12:16 PM, Donohoe, Mark wrote: > > > > > > > Bob, so what should we put in the release notes? It seems > like we are > > going to ship with it in the current state, so it would be good to > > document in the release notes what the issues are (I'm not sure what > > they are).... > > > > Mary? Thoughts on this. > >> > >>
Mark & Bob, Yes, there are a handful of open bugs that will not get fixed for 1.1. (At least 3 I know of, are license identification issues that should be addressed in 1.2.) As Bob suggests, we should add these to the Known Issues section of the release notes http://fossology.org/release_notes#known_issues. Mary _______________________________________________ fossology mailing list [email protected] http://fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology
