On Jul 15, 2009, at 4:22 PM, Jeff Sheltren wrote:
On Jul 15, 2009, at 9:25 AM, Bob Gobeille wrote:
On Jul 15, 2009, at 8:33 AM, Gobeille, Robert wrote:
On Jul 15, 2009, at 12:10 AM, Ma, Dong (vinc...@gdcc-bj-most) wrote:
The standard RHEL4 distribution does not include a 'yum' repository
or client, so I think we didn't need to provide yum repository for
RHEL.
Ok, let's forget RHEL4 in the yum repo. But we still need RHEL5
since yum is standard there.
On second thought, I think we should put the RHEL4 rpm in our yum
repo. My reasons are:
1) It costs us nothing (we are already building the rpm)
2) It means that anyone using the web to browse the repo will find
ALL the rpms.
3) Although RHEL4 doesn't include yum, yum is readily available for
RHEL4.
Bob, any reason not to have RHEL4 just be a symlink to CentOS4, and
similar for RHEL5 as a link to CentOS5 (or vice-versa)?
I wish I'd thought of that. I don't think we rely on any pkgs that
are in CentOS that are not in RHEL.
Thanks Jeff!
Bob
_______________________________________________
fossology mailing list
[email protected]
http://fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology
