Hi Roger, As we discussed in our team meeting, we plan to move fossology to git in this release and I will work on this, I saw you have registered https://github.com/fossology, can you add me as the member? My github name is: larainema
Thanks, Vincent > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:fossology- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Meier, Roger > Sent: 2013年11月26日 15:07 > To: Gobeille, Robert > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [FOSSology] git repository for fossology? > > Hi Bob > > Sorry! I was too busy for a fast reply ;-r > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Gobeille, Robert [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Dienstag, 19. November 2013 02:41 > > To: Meier, Roger > > Cc: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [FOSSology] git repository for fossology? > > > > On Nov 18, 2013, at 10:12 AM, Meier, Roger <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > >> If the majority of code developers want to change, I’ll go along > with it. > > I > > >> think in this case it makes sense to classify a code developer as > anyone > > who > > >> has contributed a code change (either by submitting a patch or > that has svn > > >> access). I’ll also take votes from anyone who says they would > contribute > > if > > >> we moved to git. Fair enough? > > > Great, thats cool! > > > Here's a +1 for git from my side. > > > > > > All the best! > > > Roger > > > > > > PS: > > > I gave it a try by converting trunk to git with > > https://github.com/nirvdrum/svn2git > > > And the result is here: https://github.com/bufferoverflow/fossology > > > > > > Nice. > > We talked about this at our developers meeting a few minutes ago > (your invited > Thanks for invitation! > > > to join ;-). Here are my notes: > > > > 1) Paul suggested you use git-svn as an work around. But I see from > the above > > url that you are beyond that. Thanks for doing this. > > 2) None of us, except Paul, know GIT > > 3) No one had a preference. > > 4) The fossology-spdx module is already in git on github > > https://github.com/spdx-tools/fossology-spdx > > 5) Making it easier for people to contribute to fossology is a good > thing. If > > switching to git helps that, then it is worth it. > > 6) Since we are on sourceforge now, we probably wouldn’t move to > github. But > > this needs more consideration. > > 7) We have been reasonably happy with fossology.org (issue tracking, > website, > > docs,…) hosted by OSUOSL. So those infrastructure pieces on github > probably > > aren’t a big draw. But this needs more consideration. (thanks Dan) > > > > We are going to talk about this again after 2.4.0 is released (Dec. > 12, 2013) > > but I’m leaning on making the switch. > Cool! > > I just registered this https://github.com/fossology and would like to > add you as a owner. > https://github.com/fossology/fossology-test is a clone of my test > import. > Just use this, to start, play and learn git ;-r > > -roger > > > > > Bob Gobeille > _______________________________________________ > fossology mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology _______________________________________________ fossology mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology
