Hi Bob, Thank you very much for fast response with information: Probably I do not ask the first question precisely.
I mean the source code from our project that will be uploaded to the fossology for scanning purposes: 1. is the memory need for the fossology depending on the largest git blob (of several git repositories), or is the combined size of all git blobs (pointed to by HEAD in all git repositories) is required? Also during installation of fossology 2.5 I have got this information: WARNING: The following packages cannot be authenticated! fossology-common fossology-db fossology-web fossology-scheduler fossology-ununpack fossology-copyright fossology-nomos fossology-pkgagent fossology-buckets fossology-mimetype fossology-delagent fossology-wgetagent fossology Install these packages without verification [y/N]? Maybe do you know hot to avoid this Warning ? Is it possible to authenticate the packages mentioned above? Thank you very much for information. BR, Konrad On 15 May 2014 16:39, Gobeille, Robert <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Konrad, > > By memory you mean disk storage space. The 10x highly depends on the > structure of the uploaded data. For example, let’s say you upload a tar > file that contains 1000 individual source files. In this case the storage > requirement will be 2X the tar file because fossology will store the > original tar file plus the 1000 source files. The 10X estimate is based on > archives (like tar files or iso’s) containing nested archives. All these > files remain in the file repository after the scan is complete because when > you are looking at scan results we let you drill down into the actual file > contents themselves. For example, if we report that a files has a " > GPL-2.0+:3.0” license (that means it contains parts GPL-2.0 or later > license and parts of GPL-3.0), then you will probably want to look at the > license in the file itself. By keeping the contents of the files after > they are scanned, we can do that. > > Bob > > > On May 15, 2014, at 8:23 AM, Konrad Urbanski <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hello Robert, > Once more question: > the memory required for uploaded source code to the fossology it is 10 x > of uploaded data, is it: > 1. during the fossology scanning process (and it is free memory after > finished)? or > 2. also this amount of memory is required after scanning process finished? > > >
_______________________________________________ fossology mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology
