Hoi,
There is nothing in what you say what I have not already expressed. If an
argument has sufficient validity, it should be considered.
Thanks,
GerardM
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Aryeh Gregor
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 4:53 AM, Gerard Meijssen
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am quite happy to state that this is my strong opinion. I disagree
> however
> > that a community always has primacy in considerations like this. Most
> > relevant are the arguments behind the opinions expressed. When the
> community
> > has good arguments they can get their way, when they do not they should
> not.
> > The notion that I am not a member of the requesting community is
> irrelevant
> > to the quality of my arguments.
>
> The policy for fulfilling shell requests is and has always been that
> they will be fulfilled if agreement of the relevant community can be
> demonstrated, and they're technically acceptable and in line with wiki
> principles and so on (no $wgGroupPermissions['*']['edit'] = false;).
> The opinions of those outside the community are AFAIK not considered
> when fulfilling such requests, unless they point out technical
> problems or similar.
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
