2009/1/22 Anthony <[email protected]>: > On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Erik Moeller <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The attribution issue is so divisive, however, that I increasingly >> wonder whether it wouldn't be sensible to add at least a set of >> preferences to the licensing vote to better understand what people's >> preferred implementation would look like, within the scope of what we >> consider to be legally defensible parameters. > > > If more than 10% or so of voters want direct attribution, it'll probably be > enough of a critical mass to support a fork, licensed under the GFDL 1.2 > only.
Nope. The GFDL 1.2 license is so bad that any fork would still be looking to use CC just in a slightly more legal way. -- geni _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
