On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Thomas Dalton <[email protected]> wrote: > 2009/1/22 Andrew Whitworth <[email protected]>: >> Therein lies the problem with using terms like "reasonable" in a legal >> document. It's a subjective term, and there are plenty of definitions >> that are going to work for some people and not others. Arguing over >> what is and what is not reasonable is a wasted exercise: The best we >> can do it put the issue to a vote and go with the opinion expressed by >> the voting majority. > > That's the epitome of "tyranny of the majority".
I didn't say it was pretty, but then again reality rarely is. We have a lot of reasonable people* here who can't even agree with what constitutes "reasonable" attribution. * I make the blanket assumption that everybody here is being perfectly reasonable. --Andrew Whitworth _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
