2009/1/23 Nikola Smolenski <[email protected]>:
> Article length was 82028 bytes, and length of contributors' names is 650 bytes > (or 0.8% of the article's length). If that would be printed in an > encyclopedic format, the article would take some more than ten pages, and the > list of authors would take 10 rows, if printed in a slightly smaller font. To > me, this looks reasonable. It's a lot less unreasonable than many suggestions! :-) I wonder - would it be possible to get some kind of script set up to take, say, a thousand of our most popular articles and tell us what the "cite all named authors who make nontrivial contributions" result would be like? This might be a useful bit of data... -- - Andrew Gray [email protected] _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
