On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Andrew Gray <[email protected]> wrote: > 2009/1/23 Nikola Smolenski <[email protected]>: >> Article length was 82028 bytes, and length of contributors' names is 650 >> bytes >> (or 0.8% of the article's length). If that would be printed in an >> encyclopedic format, the article would take some more than ten pages, and the >> list of authors would take 10 rows, if printed in a slightly smaller font. To >> me, this looks reasonable. > > It's a lot less unreasonable than many suggestions! :-) > > I wonder - would it be possible to get some kind of script set up to > take, say, a thousand of our most popular articles and tell us what > the "cite all named authors who make nontrivial contributions" result > would be like? This might be a useful bit of data...
If you define "nontrivial" for me, that should not be too hard... -- André Engels, [email protected] _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
