On Tuesday 03 February 2009 20:43:23 Thomas Dalton wrote: > 2009/2/3 Nikola Smolenski <[email protected]>: > > On Tuesday 03 February 2009 20:22:02 Sam Johnston wrote: > >> Given that full attributions are both largely worthless and onerous to > >> the point of forbidding reuse in many circumstances (e.g. paragraph > > > > Please stop beating the dead horse. No one has ever suggested that full > > attributions are necessary. > > Um... yes we have... unless "full attribution" means something > different to you than it does to me. To me it means giving a full list > of authors of a work along with the work - that's precisely what I > interpret CC-BY-SA as requiring (it's rather flexible on exactly how
In the context of Sam's mail "full attribution" refers to a list of all editors of the article, not a list of all authors. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
