On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 8:51 AM, Chad <[email protected]> wrote:
> > That aside: the two situations are entirely different. This proposal > is effectively outsourcing a section of Wikipedia to some experts > in the field. That's entirely unlike the Foundation deciding to add > an additional language for Wikipedia to appear in. I think this perfectly fits with the spirit of copyleft, so it's a great idea. Under copyleft, you're free to use some content and modify it, provided that it stays free. In this way, we both benefit. Up to now, there hasn't been that much emphasis on the fact that wiki* content can be improved offsite and then re-imported back. So, if there is an efficient way to do it, let's go for it. Cruccone _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
