On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Brian <[email protected]> wrote:
> 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5 at the re-user's option seems like a good compromise. Compromise? Between what two sides would that be a compromise? Might as well make it 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 or 6 at the re-user's option. Now there's a compromise, eh? LOL. Oh oh, here's a compromise. 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 at the author's option. Or, how about 1, 2, 3, 4, *and* 5. LOL. On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 9:34 PM, David Goodman <[email protected]> wrote: > This [1, 2, 3, 4 or 5 at the re-user's option] is exactly the same as 1. I'd say it's much worse than 1. It's certainly not *exactly* the same. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
