2009/3/7 Brian <[email protected]>: > Ultimately it does not seem reasonable to force the printing of a URL > on non-hypertext mediums.
I still believe we ought to avoid explicit distinction between media forms because I think these distinctions are inherently fragile. When you take the printed book and read it on the Kindle, or you have the DVD and a net connection, suddenly the link _can_ be clickable and meaningful. I think we can recommend a link to the article, and rely to the "reasonable to the medium or means" clause in CC-BY-SA to provide some flexibility for edge cases. As per earlier discussions, the link clause should probably be phrased so that reference to any transparent copy that includes the same licensing and authorship information as the Wikipedia.org copy is sufficient credit, allowing for forks that retain authorship information while separating themselves from Wikipedia fully. -- Erik Möller Deputy Director, Wikimedia Foundation Support Free Knowledge: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
