If there are no specifics instructions as to what a link is except that it contains the correct url then I can argue that this is sufficient attribution:
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Some Article" rel="nofollow">source</a> This is not the kind of attribution I have in mind. On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 11:09 PM, Chris Down <[email protected]> wrote: > Whilst I concur that we need to address more of the specifics, I would > disagree that the proposal should incorporate rigidity about the link text > itself. There are various contexts which this will potentially accompany, > and I cannot imagine that there is a one-size-fits-all link title. > > - Chris > > On _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
