2009/3/10 Sage Ross <ragesoss+wikipe...@gmail.com>: > This is unclear. "but must otherwise" can be read to apply only to > rich media that are 5+ collaborations and for which a reuser chooses > not to use the above "same fashion" author list. But I assume > "attributed in the manner specified by the uploader" ought to apply > both in the 5+ cases where a "same fashion" list is not used and in > all cases with rich media made by 4 or fewer people.
I've revised it in: http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Licensing_update&oldid=1422126 Essentially, I'm looking for a wording that applies roughly the same standards to text and multimedia, while recognizing that most multimedia works we have today are single-author works. The idea is that if you're talking about a true collaboration between multiple authors, you could attribute it in the same way in which you would attribute a Wikipedia article (by linking to the source), whereas if it's essentially the work of one or very few authors, you have to name them. -- Erik Möller Deputy Director, Wikimedia Foundation Support Free Knowledge: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
