On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 10:01 AM, David Gerard <[email protected]> wrote:
> 2009/3/16 Anthony <[email protected]>: > > > In the context of an encyclopedia or encyclopedia article, what > attribution > > means seems clear, listing the names or the pseudonyms of the authors. > That > > I'm apt to not raise a fuss over a reuser who fails to do this in certain > > situations (e.g. where that list is just a click away) does not create a > > slippery slope whereby it is OK for any reuser to omit this list of names > in > > any situation they deem appropriate. > > In that case, surely the letter of the license (and having touched all > bases first as far as getting the reuser to do the right thing) is all > the aggrieved contributor needs. > > WMF advice can't actually construct new terms for the CC by-sa 3.0. It can't even release my contributions under CC by-sa 3.0, for that matter. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
