2009/3/17 Robert Rohde <[email protected]>: > Some people on this list have had a negative reaction to the licensing > proposal. Sometimes this arises from different understandings of what > the new license will mean (i.e. issues of interpretation). More often > it seems the core issues are different opinions about whether the > change is desirable (i.e. issues of personal preference). For > example, if you believe the license text ought to appear alongside > every copy, then you have a personal preference for the GFDL. > > The licensing update FAQ [1] has largely been written in the voice of > the Foundation. It explains what is going on, what the advantages of > the transition are, and what some of the implications are. However, > it does not generally speak for the opposition, nor does it explain > why anyone would prefer the GFDL, even though some people on this list > clearly do. >
1 person on this list. The rest of the opposition comes from the foundations unlawful and ill thought out proposed TOS. -- geni _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
