On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 1:57 AM, Thomas Dalton <[email protected]> wrote: > 10% doesn't sound at all reasonable to me.
In one of the previous emails I described that 5 very active contributors were not happy with the situation at sr.wp at the time when there were ~40 very active contributors. I don't think that sr.wp had much more than 100 important contributors and I may count 10 unhappy. So, the first 10% have some empirical grounds. Actually, even the next 10% have empirical grounds: I know the person who would sue sr.wp community if they can. Fortunately, the next 10% are 0.1. >> But, it is reasonable to suppose that Mike's legal predictions are >> more relevant than mine :) So, legal part is no issue anymore for me. > > Only the last percentage is really a legal prediction, the rest are > more predictions of human behaviour. That said, the last percentage is > probably the only one that anyone can give anything more than a wild > guess at (which is why I didn't choose any stronger words than > "plausible" to describe them). I was not EFF lawyer and Serbia is an irrelevant place for copyright and patent issues: we have 1 (one) person with PhD in copyright :) _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
