On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:07 PM, Erik Moeller <[email protected]> wrote:
> The change tracking history section has nothing to do with > attribution, as I've noted before. However, you're quite inconsistent on that point. As one example among many, you said earlier "Indeed, the only way in which contributors are credited in Wikipedia is through a history of changes." What is and isn't acceptable is defined through more than the license. Like polling? 1 out of 5 Wikipedians polled expressed that they expect a full list of authors to be listed in an offline copy. "Attribution by link" is acceptable to most Wikipedians, but not to all. > 4) The CC-BY-SA license grants the author the option to not supply a > name for purposes of attribution. The CC-BY-SA license grants the > author the option to supply a URL. Are you claiming that Wikipedians have supplied such a URL? What is the URL they have supplied? Must all reusers supply this URL, or is it optional for them to do so? _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
