You can find the original study at: http://www.liebertonline.com/doi/pdfplus/10.1089/cpb.2007.0225?cookieSet=1 <http://www.liebertonline.com/doi/pdfplus/10.1089/cpb.2007.0225?cookieSet=1>apparently they used a pre-existing questionairre called the BFI Questionnaire (probably stands for Big Five Inventory; the closest article in Wikipedia on the subject might be: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Five_personality_traits)
Best regards, Bence Damokos 2009/6/28 geni <[email protected]> > 2009/6/27 Phil Nash <[email protected]>: > > 1. Small sample, making statistical significance difficult to assess > > It's big enough to get some results. The ones across gender lines are > more questionable. > > > > 3. If the questionnaire isn't published, it's incapable of independent > > analysis for bias in the questions asked > > It probably is published but not circulated among the general public. > > > 4. Peer-reviewed research by whom? > > Whoever does the peer review for CyberPsychology & Behavior I supose. > > > and that's just for starters. I look forward to seeing the whole lot, > > because I, for one, disbelieve such wide conclusions. > > > The results are hardly earth shattering as it basically adds up to > "wikipedia is written but people with weak social skills aka nerds" > > -- > geni > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
