Is it time to close the advisory board wiki like we just closed quality.wikimedia.org? Considering the state you describe, I rather think so (even qualitywiki wasn't so bad). Content could be moved to foundationwiki or Meta (or both) depending on what it is.
-Mike On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 17:08 +1000, Angela wrote: > On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Samuel Klein <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > A related question - I see there was a request to set up a new domain, " > > strategy.wikimedia.org" > > > > What would this new site be for? New single-purpose wikis can flounder > > after distracting people with setting up basic infrastructure (userpages, > > handy community gathering points) and tend to segment the community in a way > > that discourages broad participation. > > That's a good point. It reminded me of the advisory board wiki, which > I just checked and found full of junk and spam with no useful edits in > a long time. Any activity there was drowned out by the creation of > accounts, user pages, templates (not sure it needed AfD...), and > off-topic pages. I've moved the content to meta and I'm guessing that > the strategy content would be better off there as well. > > Angela > > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
