On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 1:04 AM, Geoffrey Plourde<[email protected]> wrote: > Well, if the list is for general dispute resolution technique, it could be > valuable to all projects.
Its a very simple idea, and one which sort of fills a role that wikien-l played for years, and for which there are several disjointed on-wiki portals for doing certain things. For a long time I myself stated that handling things on-list was inferior to doing things on-wiki, and thus I agree with this proposals critics to some degree. But in fact on-wiki dispute resolution is scattered, disjointed, and in need of upgrades that integrate its disjointed and constituent components into a better working machine. The only thing controversial about it is that I am the one proposing it, and I don't really even understand why that in and of itself should be particularly problematic, if people can simply deal with the concept without basing their objection in privately made criticisms and characterizations. -Steven _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
