On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Casey Brown <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Brian<[email protected]> wrote: > > I recall convincing arguments on this list that meta was the appropriate > > place for this, rather than fragmenting into a new wiki. This is because > > previously created wikis succumb to wiki rot and eventually link spam. > Why > > were those arguments rejected? > > Did you see Erik's comment by any chance? > <http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2009-July/053348.html> > > -- > Casey Brown > Cbrown1023 > No I hadn't, thank you. It doesn't cover the most important case in my mind: meta is where people actually are! A new wiki is not a magic recipe for an insta-community and its hard to guarantee that everyone who would be interested in the content there will end up seeing it. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
