Probably a separate wiki will isolate the content from the community and make it less accessible for for other users.
John Brian wrote: > On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Casey Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Brian<[email protected]> wrote: >>> I recall convincing arguments on this list that meta was the appropriate >>> place for this, rather than fragmenting into a new wiki. This is because >>> previously created wikis succumb to wiki rot and eventually link spam. >> Why >>> were those arguments rejected? >> Did you see Erik's comment by any chance? >> <http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2009-July/053348.html> >> >> -- >> Casey Brown >> Cbrown1023 >> > > No I hadn't, thank you. > > It doesn't cover the most important case in my mind: meta is where people > actually are! A new wiki is not a magic recipe for an insta-community and > its hard to guarantee that everyone who would be interested in the content > there will end up seeing it. > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
