Gregory Maxwell <[email protected]> wrote: >> So, should we find a term that is suitable for all six >> billion people on this planet, or should we covertly prefer >> users who are curious enough to just click on that link to >> find out what's behind it?
> Obviously we should replace the text messages with the ulitmate > wiktionary "Defined Meaning" numeric identifier! > [...] In many cultures there are numbers with negative connota- tions (cf. [[Number of the Beast]], [[88 (number)]] and *many* more). So maybe the board should appoint a "Numbers Committee" that determines which sequences of digits (bina- ry? decimal? hexadecimal?) are acceptable for use. Obviously there is a need - just look at <URI:http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=666>: Vandalism! :-) Tim _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
