"Amir E. Aharoni" <[email protected]> wrote: > [...] > Most importantly, don't forget that you know what the abuse log is and > you know that it's harmless, but newbies don't know it. Many newbies > got really scared when they saw Windows 95's error messages about > applications that performed "illegal" actions. (I actually saw it > myself.)
> I gave several classes of basic Wikipedia editing to groups of > newbies. The misunderstandings of the technical terms - and they do > encounter these technical terms - are most unexpected. Actually, until today I did not even know what the abuse log was. But I would have treated it the same way as the block log: "Oh, it's empty, can't be that bad then!" Your experience with Windows users seems to differ vastly from mine though. I do not know of even a single one who was scared to play "Minesweeper". On the other hand, they grasp in microseconds what a "friend" in a social network is, how a politician "tweets" without opening his mouth and that not all "blackberries" are edible. So if, as you say, newbies could be frightened off by /seeing/ an "abuse log" (or a "block log") link, we should not try to find a short term that could explain to someone with no insights whatsoever in Wikipedia's inner workings what the link contains, but we should hide the link (if the log is empty). But personally, I would ask new users to endure that sight because if they want to participate in the community, there will be lots of other terms, rules and habits that they did not know beforehand. Tim _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
