Pharos wrote: > I can think of approximately 500,000 other issues that it would > perhaps be more productive for us to argue about on this list. >
So just because you have a personal dislike for a comment you want to call it arguing. You're making far too big a deal of a casual response to Thomas. Ec > On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 6:34 PM, Ray Saintonge wrote: > >> Thomas Dalton wrote: >> >>> If you are genuinely redefining the position so the existing job will >>> no longer exist then you can make the employee redundant (you have to >>> pay at least the statutory redundancy pay, which depends on length of >>> service). If you are just using it as an excuse to get rid of someone >>> you don't like, you'll get sued. If you want to fire someone they have >>> to have done something either really seriously wrong or have received >>> lots of warnings and not improved. >>> >> Employee protection and union rights are significantly weaker in the U.S. >> than in most developed countries. Some states are significantly worse than >> others. Protecting the rights of workers is on the slippery slope to >> socialism, and that would damage the ideological purity of free enterprise. >> >> Employers in other countries need to be more creative in offering >> undesirables solutions that they can't refuse. >> _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
