On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 12:25 AM, David Levy <lifeisunf...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I agree. When users edit the wikis to reflect > pro-pedophilia/pro-murder/pro-rape/pro-anything (or anti-anything) > agendas, that's when it's appropriate to act (regardless of whether > they've provided advance indication that such an issue might arise). I agree. Ages ago I saw someone editing that believed in child abuse. Their argument was that there was a historical basis for it, going back to the Greeks or somesuch. There wasn't much I could do about it because we're all essentially just people on the internet, and he wasn't actually saying he had committed a sex-crime that one could report. I think this issue is something we don't have to worry about too much. People like that will be few and far between; if people start agitating for criminal beliefs I think the community can handle it. They'll be rightly despised in our community as much as they are in real life. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
