On 2 March 2010 13:04, Peter Gervai <[email protected]> wrote: > Which does not imply it's been a failure. But generally my measure would be > a) bad mood/stress level of the editors doing patrolling (which by my > educated guess went down), and > b) the incidents of indecent/unwanted content appearing for the wide > public (which by my observation definitely went down, my guess is > close to zero).
What about c) people not editing (or not continuing to edit) because they don't like their edits not going live immediately? Any data on that? _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
