Spasiba Yaroslav! :-) I thought I'm all alone with my opinion that it works.
Paka, Peter Hungary On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 16:06, Yaroslav M. Blanter <[email protected]> wrote: >> "Years" is a bit of an exaggeration. German Wikipedia was first and >> that was May 6, 2008. That's a little under 2 years. I don't think >> anyone has actually done any objective review of its success. >> > > Well, I am not sure I should post in this branch after Erik's very > explicit statement, but it should be posted somewhere. > > You guys behave like if en.wp is the only WMF project. > > On ru.wp we have implemented the flagged revisions in a version different > from de.wp in January 2008 ('patrol') and then switched to another version > ('flagged revisions') still different from de.wp in Augustus 2008. It was > decided that we run the flagged revisions for about a year and then > decide. > > In 2009 (I believe in May) the community had reviewed the flagged > revisions procedure and decided that it was successful. There are some > numbers to back up the progress, but they would be very much different > from en.wp anyway, and obviously we did not order a full study to an audit > company. However, we have discussed it thouroughly. There are still a > number of users (I believe two or three) who do not accept the flagged rev > mechanism as a matter of principle, but they are kind of marginal. We have > currently about 600 users who can flag and on top of this about 600 with > an autopatrol flag. Even though at the moment the flagged revs have been > introduced it was quite some turmoil, but I believe all of the vocal > critics (except for a dozen) have convinced themselves since that to have > flagged revisions is much more advantageous than not to have them. > > Cheers > Yaroslav _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
