No, actually it's not. Read this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_Copyright_Infringement_Liability_Limitation_Act#Take_down_and_Put_Back_provisions
and then figure out why this is not WMF's place to get involved other than availing itself of the safe harbor protections. Hint: check step 6. -Dan On Mar 3, 2010, at 9:11 AM, Techman224 wrote: > Unfortunately, the WMF got involved the moment when they removed the keys, > also the DMCA notice (or any other notice) > is given to the person or organization that runs the website. It is not given > to the user who posted the content as they can't > remove content after it has been published. Since the WMF got the notice, it > is their responsibility to file a counternotice or not. > > On 2010-03-03, at 7:40 AM, Dan Rosenthal wrote: > >> Doesn't matter how they were posted. If they were, and there is a valid >> notice, the action is to expeditiously remove them, notify the poster and >> let the poster decide if they want to counter-notice and contest it. >> >> All the second guessing in the world is irrelevant to a fight between two >> people (TI and the key-poster), neither of which are the WMF, and presumably >> neither of which are you. This is not our battle to fight. >> >> -Dan >> On Mar 3, 2010, at 8:28 AM, Techman224 wrote: >> >>> It depends on how the keys were posted and displayed on the wiki page, >>> however we can't see the revisions >>> with the keys because of the oversights, to see how they were posted and >>> where, so we are in the dark there. >>> >>> On 2010-03-03, at 4:38 AM, Chad wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 3:47 AM, Peter Gervai <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 04:26, Dan Rosenthal <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> I think you're misconstruing who is doing what here. The Foundation is >>>>>> not the "person" required to send the counter notice, nor do they have >>>>>> the freedom or the obligation to involve themselves in a copyright >>>>>> dispute between TI and another user. It's not their determination to >>>>>> make whether the action is necessary or not. >>>>> >>>>> So they are not and not theirs. Who is and whose it is? :-) >>>>> >>>>> (Unobfuscating: I guess he wanted to know what to do to get the >>>>> information back up.) >>>>> >>>>> g >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> foundation-l mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l >>>>> >>>> >>>> By looking on the other sites that seem to be posting it. I don't see >>>> how posting their signing keys helps anyone trying to learn about >>>> the company. >>>> >>>> This sounds like a new case of "we want to post it because they don't >>>> want it posted" >>>> >>>> -Chad >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> foundation-l mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> foundation-l mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> foundation-l mailing list >> [email protected] >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
