Techman224 wrote:
> Unfortunately, the WMF got involved the moment when they removed the keys, 
> also the DMCA notice (or any other notice)
> is given to the person or organization that runs the website. It is not given 
> to the user who posted the content as they can't
> remove content after it has been published. Since the WMF got the notice, it 
> is their responsibility to file a counternotice or not.
>
>   
No. This is why such notices should be a matter of public record.  An 
ISP who disagrees with a notice can simply leave the material there and 
wait to be sued without waiting for a counter-notice. It has the right 
to do so; this is far different from an obligation to do so as you seem 
to be suggesting.

Ec

_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

Reply via email to