Mike Godwin hett schreven: > My guess, admittedly based on nothing but anecdotal evidence, is that the > Swedish Wikipedians who created this largely artificial and unnecessary > dispute have not consulted independent trademark and copyright experts with > regard to the rationale for their decision. > Might be true, I don't know. You are an expert, so share your knowledge. What's the difference between e.g. Coca Cola with it's PD-old logo and Wikimedia? Why do we need copyright restrictions to protect our projects when Coca Cola (or any other company/organization with non-copyrighted logo) does not?
Marcus Buck User:Slomox _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
