On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 5:38 PM, Marcus Buck <m...@marcusbuck.org> wrote:
> Mike Godwin hett schreven: > > My guess, admittedly based on nothing but anecdotal evidence, is that the >> Swedish Wikipedians who created this largely artificial and unnecessary >> dispute have not consulted independent trademark and copyright experts >> with >> regard to the rationale for their decision. >> >> > Might be true, I don't know. You are an expert, so share your knowledge. > What's the difference between e.g. Coca Cola with it's PD-old logo and > Wikimedia? Why do we need copyright restrictions to protect our projects > when Coca Cola (or any other company/organization with non-copyrighted logo) > does not? > This is explained in the policy document I posted a link for. --Mike _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
