On 8 May 2010 17:27, Sydney Poore <[email protected]> wrote: > > I fully endorse every aspect of Mike Godwin's comment. > > The Boards statement makes it clear that their view is that Community > discussion is needed to find long term solutions to the issue. And that "not > censored" should not be used to halt discussions about the way to manage > content.
It hasn't been. With previous attempts "you are being a [[WP:DICK]] go away" (okey generally with less explicit phrasing) has been used to halt the discussion. Not censored or otherwise /is/ the discussion. > The clean up project initiated by Jimmy on Commons has brought much needed > attention to a long standing problem. Useful attention is a subset of attention. We've not got much of that subset right now. >Now is the time for the Community to > focus on cleaning up Commons and writing a sensible policy about managing > sexual content. The community doesn't answer to you. -- geni _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
