On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 7:29 AM, Peter Coombe <[email protected]>wrote:
> On 9 May 2010 09:50, Jimmy Wales <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 5/8/10 5:38 PM, Mike Godwin wrote: > >> On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 9:24 AM, MZMcBride<[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> Most of the egregiously bad deletions were quickly overturned, and > Jimmy > >>> was > >>> the one re-deleting the images. Now that he has agreed to stop, most of > the > >>> poor deletions have been re-reversed. I doubt Jimmy approves; there's > >>> absolutely nothing in his actions over the past few days to suggest > that he > >>> does. > >>> > >> > >> I think you do Jimmy a disservice if you think he did not anticipate > >> precisely this result. > > > > And I do approve. > > > > This is absurd. You wheel-warred to re-delete numerous images, and had > threatened to desysop anyone restoring them. You even said they > couldn't be discussed until June! And now you say you approve of the > Commons community reversing your bad deletions. > Sure, he tricked the press into thinking the images were permanently removed, then when the story blew over, you added them back. Everything went perfectly according to plan. Right Jimmy? _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
