Gerard Meijssen wrote: > Hoi, > This is not a problem. We use the numbers that we have. We could ask Google > for such numbers.. They might even be willing to share them with us. > Thanks, > GerardM >
This is not only directed at you Gerard, but to all the top-posting perverts (sorry, but I do think you are in the minority on this issue), on the list. If you can't be bothered to adhere to the tested and true conventions that ensure maximal intelligibility of extended conversations on mailing lists, newsgroups and talk pages on wikies, *do* at the very _minimum_ at least truncate the messages you are replying at, to the very minimum necessary to retain context. I confess reading the above missive by you, Gerard, and poring over the text below, that it allegedly is a response to, for a good five minutes or more. I still cannot fathom which particular bit of text -- if any -- it is a message that can be considered to remain on topic; even remotely. KTHX. Yours, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
